Laserfiche WebLink
154 <br /> <br /> issue she was addressing. She wouldn't have a problem with looking <br /> at the whole thing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver stated that if legal Counsel states that Council <br /> can't ask the County to look at traffic, then that's appropriate, <br /> because that's what an EIR does. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer recommended that the City Attorney review the <br /> letter that was given to Council. If he feels that there is <br /> something that Council should eliminate from the draft letter, then <br /> the Mayor could sign the letter as revised. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Ms. Scribner, that <br /> this letter be referred to the City Attorney to review and redraft, <br /> if necessary, prior to the Mayor signing it. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> 13. REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY <br /> <br /> There were none. <br /> <br /> 14. COMMUNICATIONS <br /> <br /> There were none. <br /> <br /> 15. CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta presented the City Council Calendar for the <br /> information of the Councilmembers. <br /> <br /> 16. CLOSED SESSION <br /> <br /> Closed session items, Dave v. City of Pleasanton and <br /> Pleasanton Villaqe Associates v. City of Pleasanton were discussed <br /> by the City Council at 7:00 p.m. <br /> <br /> 17. ADJOURNMENT <br /> <br /> There being no further business, the meeting was adjourned at <br /> 10:40 p.m., to meet again in Regular Session on Tuesday, January 7, <br /> 1992 at 7:30 p.m., in the City Council Chambers. <br /> <br /> 12/10/91 28 <br /> <br /> <br />