CCMIN111991 - Laserfiche WebLink

117 was not, as written, but if Council approved the application the way the Design Review Board did, it would give flexibility. Ms. Mohr indicated she also had concerns about condition No. 4. Her other concerns were with the easement to the rear of the Starnes property. She prefers to keep access to the property for purposes of fire safety. Mr. Swift further clarified the placement of easements, driveways, and discussed the payment for maintenance of the private road. It was pointed out that if Foothill Road were to become four lanes, then the driveway to the Starnes property would be too steep. It was moved by Mr. Tarver, and seconded by Mr. Butler, that Ordinance No. 1531 be introduced, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving Case PUD-91-2, application to rezone to PUD-Low Density Residential (LDR) and approval of a development plan for a three lot single-family custom home development on a 2.82 acre site on the west side of Foothill Road, with a maximum 30' building height including porches, decks, etc. and an access easement to the rear of the Starnes' property, subject to conditions set forth in Exhibit B, except that Condition No. 4 is modified to read the same as approved by the Design Review Board, leaving all structural decisions to the Design Review Board. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, and Tarver. NOES: Mayor Mercer ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None 7. Special and Information Reports Item 7a Actions of the Zoning Administrator, Design Reveiw Board, and Planning Commission. (IR91:75) Ms. Scribner appealed Case Z-91-208, First Deposit Corporation, the three tenants signs and four monument signs on Johnson Drive. Item 7b Minutes from the Staff Traffic Committee Meeting of 11/7/91. (IR91:73) No action was required or taken by the Council on this item. 11/19/91 9