CCMIN111991 - Laserfiche WebLink

112 San Francisco Property Task Force Mr. Frank Brandes, 6889 Corte Sonada asked that Council reconsider re-opening applications for the San Francisco Property Task Force. He referred to reports in the newspapers regarding the lack of response from the public. He assured Council that there is great concern as to what happens to this property. He sees that the reasons for the small number of applicants is the restrictive way in which the Council created the committee membership, and that some of the same people who may have been interested in participating in this are currently involved in the Ridgelands Committee, which involves a lot of time. 6. Public Hearings Item 6a AP-91-9/(GP-91-6/PUD-91-7), Krabbe-Osicki Partnership Appeal of the decisions of the Planning Commission to deny the application to (1) amend the General Plan Land Use Element designation of 0.92 acre site from General and Limited Industrial to Business Park or to any other land use designation deemed in th~ public interest, and (2) to fezone from General Industrial - 40,000 zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) - I/C-O (Industrial Commercial-Office) District or any other zoning consistent with the General Plan for the property located at 7116 Johnson Drive (200 ft. north of Commerce Drive). (SR91:479) Jeff Etnire, Attorney at Law, 6140 Stoneridge Mall Road, representing the applicants, indicated that the applicants are generally in agreement with the staff report and supports the recommendations. The only objection to the conditions is with regard to the payment of NPID fees of $3.00 per foot, or $120,000, for this one building. He further indicated that efforts to negotiate a reasonable sum with the NPID Steering Committee were unsuccessful. Mr. Etnire stated that the NPID Steering Committee has been talking about establishing guidelines since 1984 and no progress has been made. People who bought property after 1984 thought they were buying exempt properties and were not told anything different. Mr. Etnire further indicated that many properties have converted to uses which were more intensive and place a greater burden on the infrastructure, but have not had to pay any NPID fees. For example he cited the properties on Old Santa Rita Road,, which paid no fees, and the Chevron station on Hopyard Road, which paid a flat fee of $40,000. Mr. Etnire indicated his clients are asking for the same treatment as these other property owners, and further indicated that his client's building will have the same square footage, water needs, traffic, fire protection needs and an impact which should mean no additional NPID fees. 11/19/91 4