Laserfiche WebLink
68 <br /> <br /> Mr. Cordtz presented the following concerns: <br /> <br /> 1) Exhibit "A", Scope of Work, is not attached to the contract <br /> for consultant services. The "Task Descriptions" attached to <br /> the contract cover consultant hourly costs but do not describe <br /> any specifics for the scope of work to be performed. <br /> <br /> 2) This contract calls for the awarding of construction studies <br /> even before all the necessary talks and negotiations with <br /> Dublin, Zone 7 and perhaps other State and local agencies are <br /> formally entered into. <br /> <br /> 3) How will this well effect the annual water year pumping <br /> capabilities when those are presently restricted by Zone 7 <br /> contract and can now even be exceeded with the present well <br /> pumping capabilities? <br /> <br /> 4) Since the annual well pumping capacity is presently limited by <br /> contract and does not provide for enough ground water capacity <br /> to satisfy the City's present annual needs, how can we afford <br /> to give a portion of these pumping rights to Dublin? Besides <br /> sharing in a portion of the engineering/construction costs, <br /> what else will Dublin contribute in exchange for a portion our <br /> pumping rights? <br /> <br /> 5) Short of installing a direct pipeline from the proposed well <br /> to Dublin how will this water reach them in light of the <br /> present complex distribution system? <br /> <br /> 6) It would appear that this setup would relieve Zone 7 of <br /> treated water deliveries to Pleasanton, thus making those <br /> supplies available for Dublin. Again, Pleasanton would <br /> receive the hard well water from the new and existing Zone 7 <br /> wells, and Dublin would likely receive the softer water from <br /> the treatment plants. Pleasanton would still be paying the <br /> same price as if we received the softer treated water, as has <br /> been the practice all along. <br /> <br /> 7) Water resource management and its growth in Pleasanton and <br /> Livermore/Amador Valley is a very serious, costly, complex and <br /> important issue. Agreements, contracts and proposals <br /> affecting this resource should not be entered into lightly and <br /> not first without considerable and in-depth study and <br /> discussion on the parts of Council, staff, citizens and <br /> concerned Agencies. The potential for future conflicts and <br /> problems can best be avoided and resolved by these discussions <br /> occurring prior to the awarding of any contracts. <br /> <br /> 8) If Pleasanton fails to pursue regaining its old water rights <br /> or if Zone 7 does not increase pumping rights, the spending of <br /> funds for this type of consultant at this juncture in time may <br /> prove a worthless and expensive venture. <br /> <br /> 10-15-91 4 <br /> <br /> <br />