Laserfiche WebLink
189 <br /> <br /> Don Temple, 6409 Alisal, referred to the staff recommendations <br />and felt that Council should support them. He felt that the impact <br />on the Benevides property is, measurable and will be devastating. <br />He asked that the whole property not be designated as residential. <br /> <br /> Earl Bach, 446 Sycamore Road, presented a letter to Council <br />requesting the designation of Medium Density Residential on his <br />property. <br /> <br /> Dick Daggett, 5311 Bruce Drive, indicated that he had been <br />trying to build a home on his property for 16 years and appreciated <br />that this has finally come to an end so that he can build. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler did not object to reconsidering the General Plan <br />designation of the office/commercial portion of this plan. The <br />reason he would do so is because it is a major change to the <br />project. However, he did not feel that there was a need to <br />consider the designation of the other Medium Density parcels that <br />were made. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner agreed to reconsider Parcels 1, 4 and 5. She <br />reiterated Mr. Butler's comments and wanted Parcel 6, 7, 8, and 9 <br />to stay medium density. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver did not oppose reconsidering the designations for <br />these parcels. He was more concerned with the Greenes' and Bach's <br />property being low density under the original plan. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer felt that these parcels should remain Medium <br />Density. Lots 1, 4 and 5 should be designed into an entrance that <br />would have a nice wall and trees, not commercial/office space. He <br />felt that these parcels did not need to be reconsidered. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer asked if Mr. Levy's property was involved in this <br />process. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift answered yes because Mr. Levy's property is part of <br />the General Plan change; once the Specific Plan is finalized <br />(between June and September), Mr. Levy would be able to build. He <br />indicated that Mr. Levy could bring his plans in and staff could <br />begin the process. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Scribner, that <br />Resolution No. 92-77 be adopted, to reconsider the General Plan <br />designation of Parcels 1, 4 and 5 at the 4/21/92 meeting. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Scribner, and Tarver <br />NOES: Mayor Mercer <br />ABSENT: None <br />ABSTAIN: Councilmember Mohr <br /> <br />4/7/92 21 <br /> <br /> <br />