Laserfiche WebLink
182 <br /> <br /> and he asked that Kaufman & Broad study his survey prints before <br /> placing a wall on the property. He asked to be noticed on any <br /> further meetings with Kaufman & Broad because he had not been in <br /> the past. He asked what was expected of his property if this <br /> project was approved regarding Little Stanley improvements. <br /> <br /> Ray Oliveras, 247 Rachael Place, agreed with the previous <br /> speakers' comments. He supported this project. <br /> <br /> Susan Worth, 249 Rachael Place, Vice President of the Board of <br /> Directors of Country Roads Homeowners Association, explained that <br /> the safety of the children was being addressed with the <br /> association. She felt that Kaufman & Broad's plan addressed this <br /> issue in its planning. She felt that this project would be a much <br /> nicer gateway to the City than apartments. Ms. Worth supported <br /> this project and believed it would benefit their area as well. <br /> <br /> Tom Michael, 215 Rachael Place, President of Country Roads <br /> Homeowners Association, spoke in favor of this project. He felt <br /> that this type of housing was needed in this area and that this <br /> project would be a benefit to the City. <br /> <br /> Richard L. Irby, 3780 Stanley Boulevard, was concerned with <br /> the alignment of Stanley Boulevard and the traffic that would be <br /> created by this proposal. He stated that he was not noticed of any <br /> meetings regarding this project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Forsum thanked the Country Roads Association for its <br /> support. He apologized for any confusion on noticing Mr. Augusta <br /> and explained that he spoke with Mr. Irby and was told that he did <br /> not want to meet with Kaufman & Broad. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the <br /> public hearing closed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler asked Mr. Swift if the staff report reflected all <br /> changes and concerns made regarding Stanley Boulevard. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift answered that it was the same alignment that was <br /> approved by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr commented that the proposal that Mr. Callahan <br /> originally brought to Council was greeted with enthusiasm but <br /> because that project did not go through, it should not be a factor <br /> in how Council should address this project. She referred to the <br /> rezoning in Hacienda Business Park to High Density, which helped <br /> the City meet its Housing Element goal, and felt retaining this <br /> property as High Density was not an issue. <br /> <br /> 4/7/92 14 <br /> <br /> <br />