Laserfiche WebLink
51 <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Councilmember Butler <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Scribner, and seconded by Mr. Tarver, that <br /> Resolution No. 92-27 be adopted, requiring that for the project of <br /> 4262 First Street to be granted a one year extension of growth <br /> management approval, all fees which are payable upon the issuance <br /> of building permits for the project must be paid by April 1, 1992. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner Tarver and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br />NOES: None <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Butler <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> 13. REPORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY <br /> <br /> Item 13a <br />Golden Eaqle Farms; Request by Property Owners for Unqualifle~ <br />Certificates of Occupancy (SR92:36) <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer abstained on this item. <br /> <br /> Bruce Springer, P.O. Box 360, Sunel, spoke on behalf of Golden <br />Eagle West Property Owners. He stated that the Group supported the <br />staff report but suggested the liability of the lots be limited to <br />the cost of utilities required to directly serve those properties. <br />This amount was estimated at $450,000. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner indicated concern that the property owners might <br />not get reimbursed by the developer. She also wanted clarification <br />that adequate improvements had been made to the lots in question <br />with regard to access for fire protection, utilities, street <br />lights, etc. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush replied that the obligation for the improvements had <br />been created subsequent to the filing of the bankruptcy. The <br />developer has proposed a financing plan through the bankruptcy <br />court by which as lots sell, the public improvements throughout the <br />subdivision would be funded. If this should happen, there would be <br />no need to form an assessment district and neither the developer <br />nor the property owner would be obligated to pay any assessments. <br />If that didn't happen and the Council chose to form the assessment <br />district, the property owners would have a cause of action against <br />the developer. There would be no recourse against the City. <br /> <br />1/21/92 <br /> 19 <br /> <br /> <br />