CCMIN010792 - Laserfiche WebLink

19 The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Item 6q Consideration of a Neqative Declaration of' Environmental Siqnificance for Property Exchanqe Between the City of Pleasanton and Pleasanton Unified School District (SR92:19) This item was continued to the January 21, 1992 City Council Meeting. Item 6h ADDrOVe Plans and Specifications and Authorization to Call for Bids for the Construction and Testinq of a New Water Production Well an~ Pump Station, Pro~ect No. 911039 (SR92:23) Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the application. Bob Cortz, 262 W. Angela, explained that he sent his comments to the Mayor and Council and requested that the Council postpone the approval of this item until he obtained answers to his questions. Mr. Elliott responded that if the Council wanted to get the well on line for the summer, it was critical to take action. Mr. Cortz requested that his written comments be included in the minutes. Mayor Mercer agreed. (See attachment.) There being no further testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing closed. Ms. Mohr asked staff how the water wiil be distributed. Mr. Elliott answered the water was planned to be distributed one-third to DSRSD and the other two-thirds to the City of Pleasanton. He said that was primarily the basis on which the cost of the facility would be distributed. It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Mr. Butler, that Resolution No. 92-13 be adopted, based on a review of an initial environmental impact study done for this project and on a finding that no significant environmental impact would occur as outlined in the City's guidelines and on further finding that a negative declaration is appropriate in connection with the plans and 1/7/92 19