My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN010792
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCMIN010792
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:03 AM
Creation date
10/29/1999 9:58:15 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
10 <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Mr. Tarver, that <br /> Ordinance No. 1541 be introduced, to be read by title only and <br /> waiving further reading thereof, approving the application to ' <br /> rezone an approximately 1.84 acre site from Agricultural to PUD <br /> (Planned Unit Development) - Low Density Residential and to approve <br /> a two lot, single-family residential development located at 2818 <br /> Foothill Road but amending condition 8 to require a maintenance <br /> agreement instead of a Homeowners Association, and further that the <br /> design guidelines be amended to require roofing material to be of <br /> a non-wood product. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver, and Mayor <br /> Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 6d <br /> .Amendment to Ordinance No. 1432# ]~D Ordinance of the City of <br /> Pleasanton amendtna Section ~0.08,045 of the Pleas~ntQ~ Municipal <br /> Code. reauirina the use of fire retardant roof oover~nqmaterials <br /> within the CStv of pleasanton. (SR92:13) <br /> <br /> Charlie Howell, 3126 Montepelier Court, was opposed to the <br /> amendment to the Ordinance. He stated that he currently has a wood <br /> shake roof. He was concerned the decision was being driven by the <br /> emotional aspect of the Oakland Hills tragedy. Secondly, that <br /> Council was passing on an unnecessary cost to the cttlizens of the <br /> community and requested that more specific information should be <br /> given on this subject. He concluded he was also concerned that <br /> wood roofs would be banned completely in the future. Mr. Howell <br /> felt that although he had spoken with the Fire Chief, Fire Marshall <br /> and the Building Inspector on this matter, he felt the decision was <br /> not justified. ..... <br /> <br /> There was discussion about types of shake roofs and wood <br /> treatments. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mayor Mercer closed the <br /> public hearing. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner requested a clarification of the ratings by which <br /> were stated in the staff report. <br /> <br /> Fire Chief Withers'responded that there is a different test <br /> which is conducted by Underwriters Laboratories to establish each <br /> one of the classifications. The test is based on the quantity of <br /> .burning material it will resist before it ignites. <br /> <br /> Gary Nichol, Steel Roofing Manufactures Association, .-- <br /> <br /> 1/7/92 <br /> 10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.