My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN081892
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCMIN081892
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:02 AM
Creation date
10/28/1999 11:57:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
192 <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, <br /> authorizing expenditure of $5,000 for a mobile home rent study. <br /> ordinance. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Tarver and Mayor Mercer <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Councilmember Scribner <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 8c <br /> Growth Management Backloq <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver stated that he had read through the verbatim <br /> minutes of the 6/23/92 City Council meeting. He did not find the <br /> statement that he wanted a JPA instead of a park. <br /> <br /> He asked that the status of unbuilt.housing units be put into <br /> the record. He felt that Council should agree on the numbers, even <br /> if it did not agree on the definition of back-log. He believed <br /> that there are 211 units currently under construction; 1664 total <br /> units that have been approved prior to 1992; 486 approved to be <br /> developed in 1993; and 1729 to be built from 1993 to 1999. He <br /> believed that there was an omission of 200 units that were given to <br /> the School District. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated that he did not remember talking about a <br /> JPA as much as discussing a park. He explained that what he was <br /> trying to get into the record was that there should be a park on <br /> the Ridge. He did not recall Mr. Tarver supporting a park. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver stated that he did support having a park on the <br /> Ridge. He also supported the East Bay Regional Park District's <br /> Master Plan when the 1986 General Plan Review was before Council. <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer stated that was why he got confused in having <br /> Hayward, Alameda County and the Greenbelt Alliance involved in <br /> discussions about having a park. He believed that East Bay <br /> Regional Park District should be the entity involved in building a <br /> park. He stated that.Mr. Tarver is still answering the question <br /> the same as at the 6/23/92 meeting. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver felt that he had tried to make it clear what he <br /> wanted to see first was that Hayward, Alameda County and Pleasanton <br /> agree that the Ridge ought to be designated in Pleasanton's General <br /> Plan as parkland. Once that was done, an acquisition program could <br /> be set up in making a park and making it a reality. The first step <br /> is agreeing on what the designation should be. <br /> <br /> 8/18/92 14 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.