My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN061692
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCMIN061692
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:02 AM
Creation date
10/28/1999 11:50:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
97 <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Ms. Scribner, that <br />Resolution No. 92-129 be adopted, appointing Lynn Dansker as the <br />citizen at large and appointing Councilmember Scribner, for the San <br />Francisco Specific Plan Steering Committee. <br /> <br />The roll call vote was as follows: <br />AYES: Councilmembers Mohr, Scribner, and Mayor Mercer <br />NOES: Councilmember Tarver <br />ABSENT: Councilmember Butler <br />ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br />9, CITY COUNCIL COMMITTEE REPORTS <br /> <br />LAVWMA/TWA <br />ABAG <br />ACAP/ACTEB. <br />Alameda County Waste Management Authority <br />Alameda County Transportation Plan Committee <br />Mayor's Affordable Housing Task Force <br />Tri-Valley Transportation Council <br />League of California Cities <br /> <br /> There were none. <br /> <br />10. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br />Ordinance No. 1562, Amendinq the Pleasanton MuniciPal Code <br />R®qardinq Siqns on Main Street <br /> <br /> Mayor Mercer referred to Section 1B of the staff report and <br />asked what it meant. He felt that all of the downtown signs should <br />come back to Council for review and that each sign should be <br />reviewed on its own merit. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that the section was referring to the color <br />and the construction of the sign. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner referred to Subsection C and asked if this meant <br />that a non-conforming historic sign was permitted to remain the way <br />it non exists. <br /> <br /> There was discussion regarding the meaning of "historic" and <br />changing of the texts of signs. <br /> <br />6/16/92 19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.