My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060292
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCMIN060292
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:02 AM
Creation date
10/28/1999 11:49:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
56 <br /> <br /> improvement recommendations (Ray Street extension and Railroad <br /> extension) and indicated that agreements had been made. The Design <br /> Review Board had reviewed the Task Force recommendations and agreed <br /> with the flexible concept. He stated that staff recommended a <br /> flexible zone in a more limited extent. He asked for Council's <br /> direction on a street design for Main Street so that it could be <br /> completed on schedule. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta added that there were several solutions to this <br /> revitalization and was aware of the difficulty in the decision to <br /> be made. <br /> <br /> Michael Freedman, Freedman, Tung & Bottomley, explained the <br /> research which had been done on the success and failure of various <br /> downtown revitalization plans. It was found that the physical <br /> organization of a main street can contribute in a significant way <br /> to that economic revitalization. He stated the organization of <br /> main street must serve the needs of the businesses that are <br /> directly located on the main street. He described other cities' <br /> main streets which were set up in a confusing manner. The needs of <br /> businesses in many cases, as it relates to the physical <br /> organization of the street, are as follows: visibility of shops, <br /> maximum curb side parking, a lot of slow moving traffic, people on <br /> display, pedestrian amenity and comfort, and finally the ability to <br /> accommodate change. He then referred to an overhead map of the <br /> recommendations B, C, and D listed in the staff report. Mr. <br /> Freedman then analyzed each option and how they related to each <br /> other. All three options would be an improvement as well as an <br /> asset to downtown. A chart was given to Council showing the cost <br /> difference between the old Option "A" and Options B, C and D. The <br /> current Capital Improvement Budget allocation was $2.15 million and <br /> none of the options were successful in coming in at this number. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr referred to Option B and asked how the roadway could <br /> be expanded as well as the sidewalks. <br /> <br /> Mr. Freedman referred to his overhead chart and pointed out <br /> the plan and how it was layed out. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver asked if there would be 16 foot sidewalks on both <br /> sides on Main Street in Option D. <br /> <br /> Mr. Freedman stated yes. He referred to the lay out on a map. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked where were the stop and start points on the <br /> twelve blocks of Main Street. <br /> <br /> Mr. Freedman stated that it started at the bridge and ended at <br /> Bernal Avenue and pointed out the twelve blocks were counted on <br /> both sides of the street. <br /> <br /> 6/2/92 2 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.