CCMIN051992 - Laserfiche WebLink

37 It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that Resolution No. 92-99 be adopted, to establish the City's Fee Policy; and amending Resolution No. 90-131, General Financial Policies, to incorporate text referring to the Fee Policy as a separate, additional policy document. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None It was moved by Mr. Butler, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that Resolution No. 92-100 be adopted, setting forth the new Master Fee Schedule, incorporating the recommended fee changes; and rescinding Resolution No. 77-123 and all amendment thereto. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Butler, Mohr, Scribner, Tarver and Mayor Mercer NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Item 6c Adjustment to Cit~ Water Connection Fees (SR92:219) Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing open on the item. There being no testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the public hearing closed. Ms. Mohr inquired if there were some way to adjust the fees by using the Consumer Price Index or some other market-based adjustment. Ms. Acosta responded that staff will be reviewing the fees every two years and this is the first phase. Mr. Tarver questioned the phasing concept. He did not like the idea of penalizing the next people down the road. Ms. Acosta replied that one could look at the situation as viewing the glass as half empty or half full. Staff tried not to raise the fees too much. She reminded Council that there are two more steps, reviewing the growth management fee, capital improvement fee and facilities needs. Mayor Mercer indicated agreement with the philosophy that new residents should pay for new facilities. 5/19/92 5