CCMIN121592 - Laserfiche WebLink

250 Ms. Mohr felt that clarification of language is not substantial and findings could not be made that this final map is out of compliance. Mr. Roush stated that if the Council majority felt that it is appropriate to add the clarifying language to the CC&R's, staff would do so because the changes are consistent with the conditions of approval. It was moved by Mr. Pico, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that Sections 1.3, 1.5, 12.1.2 of the CC&R's be amended to add the word "earthquakes" in Section 1.3 and 1.5 and that the specific lots affected by the fault zone setback be identified in Section 12.1.2. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Mohr, Pico, Scribner and Mayor Tarver NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ~1- LEGISLATIVE UPDATE REPORTS There were none. ~2- REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER Item 12a Approval of Resolution Establishinq the City Economic Development ~dvisory Committee (SR92:513) Ms. Acosta presented the staff report. Ms. Mohr suggested that a time be set for the annual meeting. Mr. Pico asked if the policies require that the members of this Committee be residents of the City of Pleasanton. If this was not a requirement, he felt it would be appropriate to make that a requirement. He was also concerned with the make-up of the Committee. A number of his concerns would be mitigated if all of the members of the Committee are residents. He felt that the "Citizen at Large" should be a citizen of Pleasanton as well. He believed that the environmental and educational sectors are being ignored. He wanted more flexibility on the membership of the Committee. Ms. Scribner stated that normally she would agree that citizen participation is important and that the members should be citizens of the City. However, in this case she felt that the Committee is looking towards the economic viability of the City and a lot of people who make or bring in money do not live in Pleasanton. She 12/15/92 24