Laserfiche WebLink
247 <br /> <br /> have projects that could be completed in 1993. The point of this <br /> program is to employ a lot of people. <br /> <br />Alameda County Board of Supervisors -Ridqe Meetinq <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvet asked for an update of today's meeting. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta explained that Alameda County did vote to put <br />together a program that would create an open space area and <br />establish an urban limit line for the ridge area. The County would <br />work with Pleasanton and Hayward on this. <br /> <br /> ~0. MATTERS CONTINUED FOR DECISION <br /> <br /> Item 10a <br />Approval of Subdivision Agreement, Final Map, and Improvement Plans <br />for Tract 6362, Gal~ns Ranch, A-M Homes (SR92:483) <br /> <br /> Mr. Elliott presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico referred to Condition No. 48 and requested that some <br />modifications be added to the CC&R's to clarify the earthquake <br />hazard areas. He felt that the City owed a sense of responsibility <br />to the prospective purchasers of these lots to be sure that they <br />are aware of potential geological issues. He asked if the <br />applicant's representative would clarify the actions taken <br />regarding the lot line adjustment. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked for clarification on calling the bonds and <br />granting extensions for the Subdivision Agreement. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush stated that the anomaly seems to be with respect to <br />the fact that the subdivision agreements are typically dated prior <br />to the time the final map is recorded. For example, if the <br />subdivision is approved tonight, the Subdivision Agreement gets <br />dated December 15, 1992, but the final map may not get recorded <br />until a month later. This would create the situation when the <br />subdivision agreement will expire before the one year of the final <br />map. The subdivision agreement could be dated the same date as the <br />day the final map is recorded. <br /> <br /> Becky Dennis, Preserve Area Ridgelands Committee, 838 Gray Fox <br />Circle, asked if the applicant had met all of the conditions of <br />approval and how the dedication of Parcel A will affect the four <br />acre parcel that was recently deeded to the Joel/Greist property. <br />She mentioned some of the conditions of approval and did not <br />believe that the applicant has met all of the conditions. She then <br />referred to the Environmental Impact Report which indicates that <br />all of the springs should be shown on the geological map and <br />recommends that the springs should not be maintained by a single <br />homeowner. Ms. Dennis pointed out that the applicant has deeded <br /> <br />12/15/92 21 <br /> <br /> <br />