Laserfiche WebLink
237 <br /> <br />matter back before Council are being addressed. The Council <br />addressed the issue of medium sized homes and determined that the <br />use of the word "medium" was not relevant. She did not feel that <br />at this time it was appropriate to make any alterations to the <br />guidelines. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner commented that these are large lots that people <br />had purchased and they do expect to build large homes on them. <br />She had no problem with that. She was concerned with the visual <br />impact from the valley floor and that was why the restrictions were <br />developed. She did not necessarily want to change the guidelines <br />but felt that perhaps Council made it too loose for proper <br />interpretation. Her understanding was that the 7,000 square foot <br />maximum would be maintained, although the Design Review Board could <br />change that according to the visual impact. It is improper to <br />change the guidelines at this time. She would rather change the <br />definition of the 7,000 sq. ft. cap. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver apologized to the property owners for having to <br />come to Council again to discuss this matter. He did not like the <br />project from the beginning and likes it even less now that he has <br />seen the 7,000 square foot houses being built. He was hoping that <br />staff would be able to do something in the design process so that <br />the houses could be better screened and protected from the view of <br />the valley floor. Mayor Tarver stated that the guidelines had been <br />changed once before which was the mistake. He agreed that it would <br />be difficult to change the guidelines at this time but wanted to be <br />sure that the homes were well landscaped and screened. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico was concerned with the size and visibility of the <br />homes. He felt that the development needed to be mitigated as much <br />as possible. He was moved by the comments of the people who had <br />previously spoken and agreed that to change the process at this <br />point is not appropriate. He did believe that some firm guidelines <br />and limits needed to be set. He would consider a possible <br />amendment to provide a 7,000 square foot maximum for this area. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked if there was any reason to expect the average <br />home size in this area to change from 5-6,000 square feet. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that he was unable to project what people <br />would be wanting to build. The houses that have already been <br />approved include those that were in the first 13 lots which were <br />the lowest, and had water available. Those lots are among the <br />smallest in the subdivision. He guessed that larger homes on <br />average would be built on the larger lots. The largest lot is <br />approximately one and a half acres. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr stated that a smaller house could have more visual <br />impact than a larger one depending on the design. She believed <br />that the previous Council allowed staff and the applicant to <br />develop a home that met the applicant's needs and also responded to <br /> <br />12/15/92 11 <br /> <br /> <br />