My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN120192
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1992
>
CCMIN120192
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:55:02 AM
Creation date
10/28/1999 11:34:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
208 <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner offered to bring up this matter at the <br /> Committee's next meeting ...... <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico felt that the meetings should be held when there <br /> would be the largest public attendance. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr felt that there should be a time set for when the <br /> citizens are able to attend. She did recognize Mr. Ebright's <br /> concern but was also aware of the time commitments the members <br /> have. <br /> <br /> Robert Cordtz, 262 W. Angela, requested the San Francisco <br /> Property Steering Committee be disbanded and placed under the <br /> General Plan Review Committee. <br /> <br /> 6. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> There were none. <br /> <br /> 7. SPECIAL AND INFORMATION REPORTS <br /> <br /> Item 7a <br /> Actions of the Zoninq Administrator, Desiqn Review Board, and <br /> Planninq Commission (IR92:86) <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner asked if the satellite dish antenna at 435 Main <br /> Street (Alberto's Cantina) was screened. Mr. Swift answered yes. <br /> <br /> No action was required or taken by the Council on Item 7a. <br /> <br /> 8. MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCILMEMBERS <br /> <br /> Item 8a <br /> Status Report on Lot Split between A-M Homes and MannV Joel <br /> (IR92:87) <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift explained that the staff report summarizes what has <br /> happened to date but he needed to correct some information. He <br /> stated that it was his belief that Ms. Sorenson had previously <br /> indicated that she was in agreement with the powerline. In further <br /> discussions today, Ms. Sorenson indicated that she is now not <br /> satisfied that certain approvals were made and that she would <br /> appeal those actions. The system was monitored on Monday and was <br /> working as it was designed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Scribner asked if when Ms. Sorenson was informed of the <br /> approvals she did not have objection, but now she has an objection? <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said that was correct. <br /> <br /> 12/1/92 6 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.