Laserfiche WebLink
71 <br /> <br />the facility was catchy. She said that there would not be any neon <br />signs up and she was aware that whatever type of sign they pick <br />would have to go through an approval process. She envisioned some <br />type of sign in the window. She said that there had never been any <br />complaints made in the last three years against the Club when they <br />danced at the elementary schools. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler asked if Ms. Clark would object to the back door <br />being locked and used as an emergency exit only. <br /> <br /> Ms. Clark had no objection to such a condition. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr referred to Condition 8 which states this use in <br />conditional and could be revoked. She asked if Ms. Clark would be <br />comfortable with a six month review period to the Planning <br />Commission. The reason she suggested the six month review period <br />was because if the neighbors had concerns of violations they could <br />go through this same process. This would be only for 10 years if <br />it were objectionable and she assumed that Ms. Clark did not expect <br />that to be the case. <br /> <br /> Ms. Clark said that she had no problem with the condition. <br />She would appreciate to be told if at any time she was violating <br />the use permit. She reminded Council that they were investing <br />their money in this facility. She would rather be told right a way <br />if she were violating the use permit so she could correct the <br />situation rather than waiting for six months. <br /> <br /> There being no further testimony, Mr. Mercer declared the <br />public hearing closed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Butler commented that this was a good example of the <br />conditional use permit process. This type of use is anticipated <br />but not one that you would automatically approve. The fact that it <br />is conditionally approved, gives Council the opportunity to add <br />conditions. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarvet reiterated two comments made at the Planning <br />Commission: 1) people were not notified; 2) the type of people and <br />the conditions of approval. He believed that this was considered <br />a dance studio because it was giving lessons and an opportunity for <br />those to practice what they have learned. He believed that this <br />was a great program for Pleasanton and it should remain in this <br />City. He wished that there was a better location for it that would <br />not cause conflict with residents, but because of the way it was <br />conditioned, he did not object. <br /> <br />9/15/92 45 <br /> <br /> <br />