CCMIN011993 - Laserfiche WebLink

60 Robert Cordtz, 262 West Angela, inquired if this was in compliance with Division II, Title 23. He expressed concern that the City's ordinance would be challenged in the future, since the State ordinance was in place first. He further inquired if the precipitation was used in the calculations, where is the discharge statement for the property. The state model ordinance includes a disclosure statement with the project. Ms. Acosta indicated the City ordinance, if adopted, would supersede the existing state law. She further suggested that Council provide questions to staff, who may redraft the ordinance, in response. After Council has reviewed it, the ordinance will go to the other Commissions. It was determined that the ordinance will come back on the agenda for March 2, 1993. The meeting was recessed for five minutes at 9:10 p.m. The meeting was reconvened at 9:15 p.m. Item 6c Application for a lower-income exemption to the Growth Manaqement Program for an approved project consistinq of seven attached residential units (PUD-g2-8) located at the southeast comer of Palomino Drive and Concord Street (Pleasanton Rotary North) (SR 93:36) Mr. Swift presented the staff report. Mr. Tarver inquired if this exemption were conditioned upon the City's reaching an agreement with Rotary regarding the sales price of the units and other conditions. Ms. Acosta answered yes. Mr. Pico asked if the City would be purchasing the units from the Rotary and then selling them. Ms. Acosta indicated the intent is to have a process in place so that the transfer between the City and the Rotary occurs on the same day the ultimate purchasers acquire the property. In the event the City is not able to locate buyers, the City would in fact be purchasing the units and reselling them. Mr. Pico inquired why this action is being taken before the agreements are finalized. Ms. Acosta indicated it was necessary in order to proceed with tentative map processing, so as not to delay the project. 01/19/93 10