CCMIN010593 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mr. Swift stated that the noise study that was done was referred to the noise consultants of the Livermore Airport who had given the City the noise contours on their current projections. He believed that this included the right hand path for the northerly runway and the southbound turn for the southerly runway. Mr. Swift stated that the City Attorney would not be reviewing the sales of these homes. He referred to a similar project and explained the process that was used (the notice provision was reviewed by the City Attorney and approved and incorporated into the CC&R's for the project). Ms. Mohr indicated that when the Specific Plan was being conducted, the airport impacts were reviewed thoroughly. She asked if there was anything different in the Airport Protection Area proposal than what the Specific Plan Committee considered. Mr. Swift answered yes. The studies that Livermore had used to develop the Airport protection area include projections of mixes of aircraft and take-offs and landings that are beyond what is currently shown in its Airport master plan. Ms. Mohr stated that State law mandates that there be a real estate property disclosure report completed by every seller beyond the original seller (developer). She asked if a requirement of the City supersedes State law. Mr. Swift said that it was more of an addition rather than superseding it. Mayor Tarver asked staff to explain what latitude the City has in making modifications to the tentative map conditions. Mayor Tarver then referred to the road design that was approved in the past. He asked for staff to address this concern. Mr. Swift stated that Council has the discretion to implement the policies in the Zoning Ordinance and the General Plan and any other conditions that it felt should be imposed. If Council were to significantly change the subdivision, then the PUD Development Plan would need to be changed. Mr. Swift stated-that three PUD's have been approved that affect Trenery Drive prior to the current PUD. He explained what each PUD provided for the roadways and what this PUD will be providing. He added that staff believes there is flexibility as to what the ultimate street will look like. It will not look like a straight 20 foot wide street with 8 foot gravel shoulders. Mr. Pico understood that the original PUD for this project did not show sidewalks. He pointed out that the tentative map show sidewalks on one half of the streets. He asked if Council were to require that sidewalks be placed on both sides of the street, would that be considered a major modification. 1/5/93 6