Laserfiche WebLink
28 <br /> <br /> ordinance must protect against excessive rents, but allow the <br /> landlord to collect a reasonable return on investment. He <br /> indicated that the reasonable return on the fair market value <br /> standard is not constitutionally required. He referred to the <br /> letter from the attorney for GSMOL, Bruce Stanton. Mr. Stanton <br /> indicated it is not unusual for a government to be threatened with <br /> litigation and made it clear that the GSMOL will support the city <br /> in the event of litigation by providing technical assistance and <br /> data. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dobro further stated that GSMO1 is a voluntary <br /> organization supported by members residing in mobilehome parks. <br /> Mr. Dobro indicated mobilehome parks provide low cost housing to <br /> needy citizens. The residents are good citizens and do not require <br /> the kinds of services other housing developments usually require. <br /> He strongly urged Council to support this ordinance to protect the <br /> residents of this park, where the owner wants to charge $375 for a <br /> piece of dirt with no amenities, no pool, club house, jacuzzis, <br /> landscaping, or common area. In other parks, such as where he <br /> lives, he has all the amenities mentioned and his rent is $316. <br /> <br /> Matt Arnerich, 4202 Stanley Boulevard, #26, indicated he is <br /> living in a fifth-wheel at the Pleasanton Mobilehome Park. He is <br /> being charged $100 more than other tenants in the park and he has <br /> to move out every eight months. When he moves back in, the rent is <br /> raised. He indicated there is no protection for tenants. Senior <br /> citizens on fixed income cannot afford increasing rents. He urged <br /> Council to adopt the ordinance. <br /> <br /> Mike McGuire, (McGuire & Prentise Law Office), representing <br /> Mr. Wagner, asked Council not to adopt the ordinance. He believed <br /> it was a travesty and clearly unconstitutional. He said it would <br /> subject the City to legal exposure. Mr. McGuire felt this <br /> ordinance was nothing more than a tax on Jerry Wagner in order to <br /> allow him to continue to do business in the City. Since December <br /> of 1991, Mr. Wagner has not passed on any rent increases, with the <br /> exception of two or three for new people. He has withheld passing <br /> on a rent increase because of his attempts to deal with the City. <br /> Mr. McGuire expressed appreciation for Mr. Roush's attempts to work <br /> with them. He believe Council is sending a message to small <br /> businesses that if they don't deal with the city, Council will tax <br /> them. He felt this is clearly punitive. <br /> <br /> Mr. McGuire.believed the administrative fee was excessive. <br /> The maximum fee paid by mobilehome park owners in other <br /> jurisdictions is $2.62 per space. He believed that the fee <br /> structure is only to deter Mr. Wager from going forward. The rent <br /> control ordinance does not apply to anyone else because Mr. Wagner <br /> is the only one who refuses to sign the 1992 Agreement. In the <br /> negotiations with the Mobilehome Committee, Mr. McGuire raised the <br /> issue of the city subsidized garbage service which guarantees an 8% <br /> to 16% return on its investment. Mr. Wagner is now not even making <br /> <br /> 1/5/93 28 <br /> <br /> <br />