My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN051893
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1993
>
CCMIN051893
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:51 AM
Creation date
10/28/1999 10:31:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
46 <br /> <br /> 6, REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br /> <br /> Item 6a <br /> Alameda C0unty's ProDosed Chang~ to Business License Tax on Waste Disnosal Facility <br /> O0erators (SR93:201) <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico believed that the City of Pleasanton should not object to Alameda County's <br /> attempt to reduce its budgetary crisis. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvet understood the point that Mr. Pico was trying to make but believed that <br /> the City of Pleasanton was willing to help the County find funding for services in a more <br /> rational basis. A unified, comprehensive approach to services and funding is needed. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Scribner, and seconded by Ms. Dennis, opposing the proposed <br /> Alameda County amendments to the County's Business License Tax on Waste Disposal Facility <br /> Operators and directing staff to communication Council 's position to the Alameda County Board <br /> of Supervisors. <br /> <br /> Th~ r011 call Vote was as followS: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Dennis, Mohr, Scribner and Mayor Tarver <br /> NOES: Councilmember Pico <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 6b <br /> Resolution Aporovin~, Pleasanton Railroad A~sociation's Histori~ Corridor Enhancement <br /> Proiect Anplication for Interm0del Surface Transportation Effi~iCn~:y A~t (ISTEA) l~nds <br /> (SR93: 182) <br /> <br /> Bill van Gelder, Traffic Engineer, presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta suggested that Council review this application, if it still is conceptually <br /> supporting the Railroad, to eliminate any confusion before it comes to Council for approval. <br /> <br /> There was general discussion on the ISTEA Grant process and the timing of this <br /> application. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr was concerned that a lot of staff time and effort was going towards this project <br /> that may not be funded. She understood that many applications are not considered high priority. <br /> <br /> Mr. van Gelder said that this project was rated *medium" on the priority list. He felt <br /> that this was timely for Council to take action. <br /> <br /> 05/18/93 10 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.