Laserfiche WebLink
7O <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Dennis, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that Ordinance No. 1606 be <br /> re-introduced, to be read by title only and waiving further reading thereof, approving the __ <br /> application of Boulevard Development for a major modification to an approved PUD <br /> Development plan as filed under Case PUD-90-19-2M, (Moller Properties) except that the <br /> wording for Condition 16 as originally recommended by staff be included in the conditions of <br /> approval. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Dennis, Mohr, Scribner and Mayor Tarver <br /> NOES: Councilmember Pico <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> 14. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br /> <br /> Item 14a <br /> Z-93-50, Laguna Oaks Bernal Avenue Bridge/The DeSilva Group <br /> <br /> This item was continued. <br /> <br /> Item 14b <br /> PUD-81-30-55D, Si~,nature Pronerties/The Prudenthi In~ranCe Company of America <br /> Application for development plan approval to construct a 496-unit residential development <br /> consisting of 178 small-lot single-family detached units and 318 townhouse and condominium <br /> units proposed on an approximately 52.7 acre Site (LOts 8A, 8B, and 26) located within the <br /> Hacienda Business Park. The site is zoned PUD (Planned Unit DevelOpment) - HDR (High <br /> Density Residential) District. (SR93:411) <br /> <br /> Also consider adoption of a Negative Declaration <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr suggested placing a skateboard facility in the proposed park. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver declared the public hearing open on the application. <br /> <br /> Jim Ghielmetti, 6612 Owens Drive, representing Signature Properties, thanked staff for <br /> completing a staff report of this size. He was in agreement with Option 2. He requested <br /> Council to approve this recommendation. He was willing to chair a citizens' committee to help <br /> develop and work out citizens' concerns in approving the citizens' park. He then explained why <br /> option 4 of the staff report is not acceptable to Signature Properties. <br /> <br /> 10/12/93 8 <br /> <br /> <br />