Laserfiche WebLink
26 <br /> <br /> Item 6g <br /> Item 41 __ <br /> Apt>rove the Amendment and Consent to Assk, n of Development A_t, reement - Ruby Hffi. <br /> (SPO3:369) <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico referred to the Consent to Assignment and objected to Section 1. <br /> <br /> Jim McKeehan, Signature Properties, clarified Section 1 and explained that this is <br /> basically an Estoppel Certificate. The Development Agreement states that the City and County <br /> will provide Signature with a Estoppel Certificate at any time Signature needs one, if Signature <br /> is not in default. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush agreed. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Scribner, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, authorizing the City <br /> Manager to sign the Amendment and Consent to Assignment of Development Agreement for the <br /> Ruby Hill project. <br /> <br /> Th~ roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Dennis, Mohr, Scribner and Mayor Tarvet <br /> NOES: Councilmember Pico <br /> ABSENT: None <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 6h <br /> Item 4n <br /> R~olution ADDrOVln_~ the ADplication for Federal TEA Funds for Pleasanton Railroad <br /> Association Historic Corridor Rehabffitation Pro_iect (SR93:360) <br /> <br /> Ms. Scfibner was not opposed to the concept of the nilroad corridor plan but was <br /> concerned with this application because the Southern Pacific line was listed as part of the plan. <br /> There has never been discussion as to which line was going to be used by the Railroad <br /> Association. She was strongly opposed to placing tracks across Bernal Avenue. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked that a public hearing be scheduled to allow public input about the <br /> <br /> Council agreed to continue this item unffi the public hearing was scheduled. <br /> <br /> 09107193 16 <br /> <br /> <br />