My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN072099
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN072099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
10/11/1999 8:23:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/20/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
number of trucks that went to the landfill in 36 hours. She urged the Supervisors to adopt <br />provisions that would 1 ) require tracking of each load going to the dump by truck, trucker <br />and content; 2) add provisions that establish fines and penalties for both the shipper and <br />the landfill operator, including daily fines for retaining illegally dumped material; 3) <br />consider making the expansion a Class 3, for household garbage only, or make the ability <br />to receive Class 2 materials contingent on good behavior and revocable at any time based <br />on violations; 4) consider a much smaller expansion that meets state requirements but <br />reduces the risk to this Valley. She felt these added provisions were the only way to <br />protect the health and safety of Valley residents for the long term. <br /> <br /> Peggy Purnell, 2472 Via de los Milagros, commended Ms. Cebanne for her work. <br />She appreciated the Board of Supervisors holding the hearing in the Valley. She was <br />very disappointed at the statements made by the representative of the Department of <br />Toxic Substances Control. She is concerned that the public believes there is someone <br />watching what is going. She felt everyone needs to pay more attention and attend these <br />hearings. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver said he could not believe the circumstances surrounding this situation. <br />He felt someone should take the parties to court and get severe penalties to make sure it <br />never happens again. He felt the citizens of the Valley were the innocent victims of a <br />conspiracy to dump waste in this county. He believed it is time to stand up and fix the <br />problems with the system. He wanted legislation to be passed that levies severe penalties <br />to people who violate the law. People come to the Council asking for action. He said the <br />City could have the City Attorney prosecute people and hopefully get two or three times <br />the amount of money spent on litigation. That money would then be reserved to go after <br />the next violator. No one seems to be standing up for anyone else. There are deals <br />behind doors and he felt the whole system was a cause for concern. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico felt the City has the opportunity to go after these entities through the <br />litigation surrounding the land fill expansion, that the City is still participating in. He felt <br />the Waste Management people made a commitment to remove the soil within six weeks <br />and that the residents of Alameda County would not be asked to pay for it. He wanted to <br />make certain that provisions are included in any approval of the Altamont landfill <br />expansion that makes sure this situation does not happen again. What concerns him is the <br />same thing could happen tomorrow with a material more hazardous than lead. This was a <br />wake-up to the potential risks of a large landfill. He was furious at the way the political <br />and regulatory system has been corrupted to allow this to happen. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Mr. Pico, seconded by Ms. Ayala, to send the proposed <br />letter to the Alameda County Board of Supervisors. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala asked if the letter could include the provisions outlined by Donna <br />Cebanne, which are more restrictive than the current permit. She would like to have the <br />Board of Supervisor consider adding those provisions to the permit. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 20 07/20/99 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.