Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Requa said the City could do that, but money is better spent solving the <br />problem. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked when the next plant expansion is projected after completion of the <br />current project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Requa said about 12 to 14 years from now. The current expansion takes into <br />consideration those developments already approved and in the General Plans. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico clarified that the City is now in a stronger position with regard to <br />enforcement of the odor control measures. <br /> <br /> Mr. Requa agreed, due to the terms of the regional contract. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush said the supplemental agreement gives authority to spend regional <br />funds to reduce odors. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico referred to concerns about the nuclear laundry operation and the <br />potential for radionuclide particles to have been part of the sludge deposited on the San <br />Francisco Water Department property. DSRSD treated the effluent from that plant and <br />he wanted to know what assurances there were that there is no problem with radioactive <br />materials in Pleasanton and potential contamination of the environment of the <br />commercial and residential areas, especially if the soil is being plowed. <br /> <br /> Mr. Requa responded that the Clean Water Revival Project has led DSRSD to <br />investigate that issue and it has sampled its sludges and flows and said there are <br />extremely low levels of tridium, hundreds of times less than levels of concern. DSRSD <br />has done sampling and has found nothing. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked if that was public information. <br /> <br /> Mr. Requa said it will be on September 9 when the final report is done. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala referred to page 2 of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, which states <br />the Clean Water Revival Project will provide 2.5/mgd disposal capacity via groundwater <br />injection by 2000. <br /> <br /> Mr. Requa said that was from the EIR for LAVWMA that DSRSD relied on. By <br />doing that, DSRSD is depending on the LAVWMA project for disposal capacity, not the <br />Clean Water Revival Project. The Clean Water Revival Project will not be used for <br />wastewater disposal. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala referred to the CAPP initiative and asked how it would affect the costs <br />of this project. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 14 07/20/99 <br /> <br /> <br />