My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN070699
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN070699
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
8/5/1999 10:27:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
7/6/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Addressing the concems has caused a delay in the process. He said there are two choices, <br />rush this through in order to get this on the November ballot or go through a process that <br />is more appropriate for a project of this magnitude. He felt a report could be brought <br />before Council in August. He did not want to rush the process. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver understood what he was saying but felt San Francisco was pushing <br />for a March 2000 election and did not want to wait until November 2000. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lymburn said March is a presidential primary election and felt the turn out <br />would be good. He would discuss a November 2000 election with his Commission, but <br />felt it was not necessary to wait that long. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said the Planning Commission has only addressed the concems <br />and has not had a detailed discussion of the project itself. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver understood the Planning Commission had a motion on the floor to <br />deny the certification of the Environmental Impact Report, at which time San Francisco <br />asked for a continuation. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lymbum said that is correct. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if he was ready to address the Planning Commission's <br />concerns at its next meeting. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lymbum said yes. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if the Planning Commission would be finished with the <br />discussion at its next meeting. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift said a response to the concerns about the Environmental Impact Report <br />concern has not been prepared. At the next meeting the Planning Commission is to <br />discuss the twenty-seven issues and try to reach a consensus on those items. If the <br />Council directs the Planning Commission to finish tomorrow evening then it is unlikely <br />that San Francisco would be able to address the concern about the Environmental Impact <br />Report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked how this delay affects the July 1 deadline with the School <br />District. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lymbum said a letter was written by the School District asking for an <br />extension of time. That will be on the Public Utilities Commission's agenda in a week <br />and he felt that if we could reach an understanding on the timing, that the extension <br />would be approved. <br /> <br /> Matthew Morrison, 5581-A Sonoma Drive, believes that the San Francisco land is <br />contaminated and the Scope of the contaminants has not been fully addressed in the <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 18 07\06\99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.