My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN060199
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN060199
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
6/25/1999 7:18:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
6/1/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
28
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
case or a catalogue, but if a customer wants to see the gun, then the qualified person should be <br />called to deal with the customer. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if this requires everyone in the department to be fingerprinted. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis said no, only those who will be handling the firearm and filling out the <br />paperwork, not just anyone who discusses firearms only. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver said the procedure addresses the person "most responsible" who is involved in <br />showing the firearm and filling out the DROS. Who has key access to the gun and who controls it <br />until it goes back into the case or is given to the customer? That is the one to be fingerprinted and <br />have his/her background checked. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis felt that was closer to what she wanted when the ordinance was put to a vote. <br />This could cause some inconvenience to retailers and she would like the retail operator to be able to <br />give customer assistance immediately. It doesn't hurt to have an additional salesperson there to <br />discuss the guns. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver suggested adopting the administrative procedure and that provides anyone that is <br />involved in the sale of firearms, showing firearms to customers or filling out the DROS or handing <br />the gun over to the customer, should have the background check. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush believed that examples 1 through 5 may be necessary because they dealt with <br />different types of stores and firearm sellers. He felt examples 3, 4, and 5 could be modified. The <br />first sentence would include the person who shows firearms and or who fills out the DROS would <br />be required to have fingerprints processed and provide background information. The person who <br />only discusses firearms would be excluded. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver objected to all the different distinctions. The same thing applies; if you touch a <br />gun, you have to be fingerprinted and provide background information. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis felt that was a good distinction. A person is involved in the sale of a firearm if <br />the person handles the firearm or assists in filling out the DROS that person would need to have a <br />background check. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Dennis, and seconded by Mayor Tarver, to adopt Resolution <br />99-075, amending the Master Fee Schedule by establishing fees for the firearm sales permits. <br /> <br /> Ms. Ayala felt this process was missing the point at which the potential buyer's state of <br />mind is assessed. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 23 06/01/99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.