Laserfiche WebLink
has information that Congress will be passing laws that gun shows and anyone selling a gun at a <br />gun show be responsible for filling out the proper paperwork on the buyer of a gun. He supports <br />that and feels that anyone selling a firearm should be treated the same way as he is. He understood <br />the city's concerns that a person not be able to buy a gun to commit a criminal act and noted that <br />only 1% of gun owners commit crimes. His main concern is the cost of licensing and the cost to <br />fingerprinthimself and staff. There is a cost to him of $820. This may not be a lot to a store like <br />Walmart, but for a small business it is. There are 20,000 laws in the country against gun owners. <br />More and more states are enacting laws against gun dealers. If you need all these fingerprints, the <br />City should pay for them. He felt $350 a year was a sufficient fee. He cited the lower fees charged <br />in other cities and the fact that they do not require fingerprints to do background checks. He asked <br />if fingerprints were to be taken every year. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush thought they would be required annually. <br /> <br /> Kimberly Rowland, 3650 Locke Court, indicated the fingerprint checks are done one time <br />and the scantron or lifescan process updates annually. So only new employees would be required <br />to have fingerprints. Two-thirds of the voters approved Measure G and they did that for safety and <br />reduced accessibility to guns in Pleasanton. She objected to ammunition being accessible in the <br />store aisles. She was told that was just shotgun shells, but she still believed all ammunition should <br />be locked up. Her other issue was that Mr. Thomas and Walmart agreed to put surveillance video <br />cameras in the firearms areas, but Outdoor World was given 90 days to install them and she felt one <br />day without a camera was too long. She had concerns with staff recommendations 3, 4 and 5 <br />regarding requirements for permit applications, fingerprinting, and background information. Her <br />basic concern is that a person who does not have a background check and is working in the firearms <br />department can show a weapon, initiate a sale and help a customer to complete a DROS (dealer <br />record of sale) form. This is the most sensitive time in a gun purchase, when the sales clerk <br />establishes the potential buyer's qualifications and state of mind. Ten days later the buyer comes <br />back to pick up the gun and will deal with an employee who has had a background check, but that <br />employee may not have been present at the initial contact. She felt the federal form and the follow- <br />up is a technicality. That second person only verities identification and the completeness of the <br />form. There is too much room for something to go wrong when dealing with a lethal product. She <br />referred to the ASSC dealing with Congress to get gun show dealers to have the same <br />responsibilities retail dealers have. The ASSC is the American Sport Shooting Council, which is a <br />lobby that is working to bring gun shows up to speed. She would prefer that there not be gun <br />shows at the Fairgrounds, but there is a federal firearm licensed dealer present at the gun shows. <br />She believed that the costs Mr. Thomas complained of are the cost of doing business. If you want <br />to sell guns in Pleasanton, that is what the voters approved. It costs $375,000 per firearm death; <br />$800 one time and about $400 per year is not a lot to ask. She referred to an incident in a Utah <br />Kmart where a young boy was allowed by a clerk who had not had the background check to <br />purchase a firearm using a passport as identification. The young boy later committed suicide. The <br />parents are now suing Kmart. She felt this was economically feasible for gun dealers to have this <br />procedure and they are exposed to liability without it. <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 20 06/01/99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />