My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN042099
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1999
>
CCMIN042099
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:17 AM
Creation date
6/10/1999 3:37:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
4/20/1999
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ms. Housen said this is correct. The pipeline going through the interchange at Foothill <br />Road might have to be replaced instead ofrelining. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked if there was an alternative to just do one pipeline and abandon the <br />relining of the existing pipeline. <br /> <br /> Ms. Housen said that alternative would have to be approved by the LAVWMA Board. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked what would be accomplished if the trees had to be removed in order to <br />reline the existing pipeline. <br /> <br /> Ms. Housen said there would be fewer impacts if a single pipeline were installed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti said if a one-pipeline altemative were done the new configuration could be <br />done over the fatfit line, around the trees, etc. <br /> <br /> Ms. Housen said yes, if everyone agreed to a single pipeline. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked about the community meeting. <br /> <br /> Ms. Housen said a community meeting would be held at the Resurrection Greek Orthodox <br />Church, 20104 Center Street, Castro Valley. The church is near the proposed alignment in Castro <br />Valley. The open house will be from 5:00 p.m. to 8:00 p.m. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti understood 40% of the project will be a single pipeline and 60% will be a <br />dual pipeline. But in all cases it limits the capacity to what was agreed upon. Is it possible to put in <br />a single pipeline alternative without increasing the capacity, where some of the pipeline is being <br />replaced because it absolutely needs to be replaced. <br /> <br /> Ms. Housen said that might be technically possible. <br /> Vice Mayor Ayala declared the public hearing open. <br /> There were no speakers on this item. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked why the dual pipeline was preserved in some portions and why the whole <br />project was not rethought. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico said the people of Pleasanton voted on the sewer expansion project that was a dual <br />pipeline project. The ballot arguments and analysis were based on a dual pipeline concept. <br />Building a single 41.2 mgd pipeline could have significantly greater capacity if modifications were <br />made to the pumping system. Those changes to potentially expand the capacity beyond 41.2 mgd <br /> <br />Pleasanton City Council 8 04/20/99 <br />Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.