CCMIN070594 - Laserfiche WebLink

A substitute motion was made by Ms. Dennis to continue this matter until plans were drawn and staff was able to review and comment on them. The motion died for lack of a second. Mr. Pico believed that all of the parties wanted the road reconstructed. He was surprised that the original PUD did not specify construction standards or permit requirements. He disagreed that this matter should be continued until plans were completed. Ms. Scribner agreed that the PUD was not specific but believed that was because it was assumed that the property owners would come to some agreement. She supported staff recommendation to refer this matter to staff. Mayor Tarver was concerned with public policy and private interest. He agreed that the road would be a benefit to everyone involved, but was concerned a number of the issues raised that are related to the safety of the roadway. A substitute motion was made by Mr. Pico, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that Resolution No. 94-77, be adopted, upholding the appeal of the Planning Commission, and upholding the Planning Director' s determination that the proposed private driveway improvements by Manhie Joel and Manha Greist are consistent with the existing PUD on the property, subject to the following conditions: 1) Before proceeding with work, the applicant shall provide a drawing to the Building Department indicating the scope of work to be performed for verification as to whether any building or grading permits are required. The drawing shall be prepared in sufficient detail for this purpose, but need not be prepared by a licensed engineer unless otherwise required by law; 2) Upon the determination that permits are required, the applicant will comply with the direction of the Building Department and secure permits before proceeding with work; 3) As a condition of the permit, the applicant shall provide 24 hours notice in advance of start of work, and the work shall be subject to periodic inspections by the Building Department to verify conformance with submitted plans; and 4) During the grading between Stations 12 and 13, an engineering geologist shall be present to review the cut slope to ensure that no unforseen stability problems are present. If unforeseen stability problems are present, the applicant shall develop a plan to implement measures prescribed by the engineering geologist for City approval prior to performing said work. Th~ roll Gall vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Mohr, Pico, Scribner and Mayor Tarver NOES: Councilmember Dennis ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Council took a break at 9:30 p.m. Council reconvened at 9:37 p.m. 07/05/94 7