CCMIN062194 - Laserfiche WebLink

In response to Ms. Dennis, Mr. Lum further explained when the City assumed the system that was designed to service the area that made up the assessment district. Mr. Roush disagreed with the statement that the City had a contractual obligation to Mr. Schneider. There was general discussion regarding the Pleasanton Township Water District, the City's obligation according to the Municipal Code, and the option of refunding the monies. Mr. Pico asked when PMC § 14.08.090 was adopted and what the statute of limitations was. He then asked that this matter be continued until additional information was available from It was moved by Ms. Scribner, to refund Mr. Schneider half of what he has requested, $3,011. This would eliminate the amount of staff time it would take to research the matter. The motion died for lack of a second. Ms. Dennis did not object to crediting Mr. Schneider as Ms. Scribner had suggested, however, she was concerned with not doing the research necessary for any further requests. It was moved by Ms. Mohr, and seconded by Ms. Dennis, to continue this item to the July 5, 1994 City Council meeting and ask that staff review the history of PMC §14.08.090. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Dennis, Mohr, Pico and Scribner NOES: None ABSENT: Mayor Tarver ABSTAIN: None Council took a break at 9:50 p.m. Council re, convened at 9: 56 p.m. Item 10b AccePtance of Alameda County Economic Development Board's Red Tape Round Table Report (SR94:134) George Withers, Fire Chief, presented the staff report. Gail Gilpin, Economic Development Manager and Chief Withers made a slide show presentation. It was moved by Ms. Scribner, and seconded by Ms. Mohr, that Resolution No. 94-74, be adopted, accepting the Alameda County Economic Development Advisory Board' s Red Tape .-- Round Table Report. 06/21/94 11