CCMIN053194 - Laserfiche WebLink

Gary Schwaegerle, 189 W. Angela Street, thanked the City planning staff for their review of the plans and architectural suggestions. Neil Nostrand, 4698 Second Street, indicated he had worked with the school district on the plans for the facility and he believed it was an enhancement to the school and neighborhood. Sharrell Michelotti, 7873 Olive Court, inquired about the difference in height between the new facility and the existing buildings. She was informed there was a difference of only three feet. Ms. Michelotti encouraged the School Board and City Council to continue to work together. Ms. Haugen conveyed her appreciation to the School District staff and City staff for their time and cooperative efforts. Mr. Tarver asked which building would contain classrooms for training and instruction. Mike Ananos responded that classrooms would be included in graphics, data processing, warehouse and maintenance facilities. It was also indicated that the classrooms would be utilized by the students and teachers of the District's Regional Occupational Programs (ROP). In addition, the classrooms can be used by the Amador Valley Adult School. Mr. Tarver also inquired if the State Architect had reviewed the plans. Dr. McCurtain indicated only the City Building Department had reviewed them. Mr. Pico inquired regarding the hours of operation and was told the hours would be the same as they currently are, approximately 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Ms. Mohr asked if there would be any vehicle maintenance outside the buildings and the reply was that the vehicle maintenance facility is being designed to support inside vehicle repair. Ms. Dennis asked if the roof was to be painted. Mr. Ananos indicated the roof would be painted similar to the Harvest Park gym, however, the decision on color had not yet been made. Ms. Mohr asked about notice to the Homeowners Association regarding the proposal. Dr. James indicated that a meeting was held with the Homeowners Association Boad of Directors, and the District assumed the Association had notified all of its members. 5. DEL PRADO PROPERTY - DISCUSSION Dr. McCurtain indicated the property has been declared surplus. The next step is to advertise the property and allow sixty days for any public agency to express interest. If no public agency expresses interest, then the property will be advertised for sale to any interested party. At this time the property has not been advertised, so the sixty-day period is not running. 5/31/94 - 2 -