CCMIN050394 - Laserfiche WebLink

neighbors regarding his business and asked if they opposed it being at this location. Those with whom he was unable to speak with he had written letters. He further explained that the area would be used for his equipment, but not as a storage area for materials. The house which sits in front of the business site will be rented in order to let the residential effect remain. He added that he does not use and would not store pesticides at the site. Leah Jones, P.O. Box 262, reiterated that the site would not be used as a storage site; rather it would be used as a temporary parking area for vehicles. She named the types of equipment that would be used at the site (i.e. brooms, rakes, etc.). She did not want to appear as if she and the applicant were changing plans frequently, but as Mr. Grimes stated, they were just trying to accommodate staffs recommendations. Ms. Jones further explained that the office area would be used as a meeting room for safety meetings and the garage would be used for demonstrations of equipment. Ms. Jones thanked staff for its time and efforts and again apologized for misleading people by the "storage" description. In response to Council's questions, Mr. Grimes reiterated that he would not be storing pesticicles and that the driveway would be paved. There would be no noise impact on the residents in the area. If downtown were to grow and prosper enough that his business would no longer be suitable for the area he would be willing to sell move the business. There being no further testimony, Mr. Tarver declared the public hearing closed. Council shared the concern of approving this as a conditional use permit because later, if the time came that the business no longer "fit" in with the surrounding uses, it would need to move. Mr. Pico and Ms. Dennis were concerned with setting a precedent for other businesses to apply for such a permit. It was moved by Mr. Pico, and seconded by Ms. Scribner, upholding the appeal of the Planning Commission, thereby finding that the use was not a conditionally permitted use in this zoning district. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Dennis, Pico and Scribner NOES: Councilmember Mohr and Mayor Tarver ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None COntinuation of Item 7a PUD-85-15-4M, R0nald C. Vella An agreement had not been reached this evening between Mr. Vella and Mr. Henstorf and therefore, the motion remained as stated before: 05/03/94 14