Laserfiche WebLink
Christine Bourg, 4512 Second Street, spoke about the inconsistencies of the proposed <br />plan and the recommendations made by the General Plan Steering Committee. The proposed <br />1,900 housing units exceeds the recommended f'mal build-out population. Also, over 70% of <br />the community survey stated that expanding the population to over 70,000 would make <br />Pleasanton a less desirable place to live. Traffic concerns, local streets and the freeways, air <br />quality, water availability, and preservation of the small town character have also been <br />mentioned a number of times. She also reminded the audience that over 2,000 units have <br />already been approved to be built within the City. She read many citizen comments from the <br />Community Survey; Ms. Bourg does not believe these comments/concerns are reflected in the <br />proposed development plan. <br /> <br /> Joan Tenbrink, 4265 Mindor Drive, would like to make sure that there is a viewshed <br />preserved for the entrance into Pleasanton. She does not want to rush into the largest <br />development in Pleasanton's history; public comment is that the public doesn't want more <br />housing development, they want more community development. Ms. Tenbrink noted that only <br />five acres were designated for school property, citing that the School District had determined <br />the Del Prado property was too small at five acres. She does not want to make a hasty decision <br />and would like more input from the community. Ms. Tenbrink does not feel this is a good plan <br />and does not want the elected officials to let this plan go through. <br /> <br /> Donald Adams, 4 133 Stanley Blvd., noted that there are large areas on the map that are <br />not shown. He feels the commercial area is too close to the Downtown. He suggested the <br />commercial area should be along the freeway or on the west side of the freeway, and move the <br />golf course along Bernal Avenue, with the housing areas in the middle of the property. <br /> <br /> Joy Schorno, 12 Foothill Place, does not want to develop the property but knows that <br />desire is not realistic. She would like to see a cemetery developed; land is getting scarce and <br />she would like to be buried in her own community. She feels this would also add to the rural <br />look along 1-680. <br /> <br /> Kay Ayalla, 4515 Gatetree Circle, stated she would love to have Pleasanton be able to <br />buy the property to develop it. However, she does not believe the proposed plan is a bad plan. <br />She would like to stress the rico-traditional style, bike paths throughout the plan, wants the golf <br />course to be a municipal golf course, no more than 1,600 housing units, a hotel, ten acres <br />designated for a church, trails connected to the East Bay Regional Park District, and a museum. <br />She does not want this to go to a referendum nor to the courts. <br /> <br /> Larry Levin, 3178 Weymouth Court, suggested that some units be dedicated to senior <br />affordable housing. He hopes the officials can come to agreement because he would not want <br />this property developed through the County nor go to a referendum. <br /> <br /> George Gunter, 1805 Greenwood Road, stated he was the Chairman of the General Plan <br />Steering Committee and recapped numerous other speakers' comments. He advised that the <br />General Plan Steering Committee and subcommittees were asking that an economic analysis be <br /> <br />12/11/95 - 5 - City Council Minutes <br /> <br /> <br />