CCMIN120495 - Laserfiche WebLink

units and the custom lot projects do not have to be counted in the total. He felt the custom lots should be counted when the infrastructure goes in and not counted again in a later year when the permits are pulled. Regarding the Walnut Glen Estates project, he felt the staff treatment was accurate. With regard to the St. Johns Place project, he wholeheartedly supported Option 1 and/or Option 4. In either case, he asked that Council allow some extension for the time to pull the permits, because of the lateness of this review process. He asked for an extension into next year to allow time to work out the plans with staff. Regarding Del Prado, the School District has asked that the note be paid off as soon as possible and New Cities has entered into an agreement to pay off the note when New Cities gets tentative map approval and growth management allocation. It has submitted the tentative map and hopes for a decision in January. The final map should be filed in April and if it could get growth management for 1996, it could start construction in April and satisfy the School District's request to pay off the loan. Mr. Bates again stated he could support Option 1 or Option 4, but requested if Option 4 is selected, that Council reserve the 1996 allocations at this time. Ms. Mohr clarified that in Option 4, New Cities wants the units secured. The units for the Del Prado site would have the asterisk removed based on the fact that this review was not done in August as planned. Because of the three month delay, New Cities was delayed in getting its permits. Mr. Bates wants the asterisk removed because if Council deletes the custom lots and those not participating in the growth management program, it would reduce the units below 750. He felt the whole discussion of 750 units is academic because there is no one here that believes 750 permits will be pulled in 1995. Ms. Michelotti referred to the request of Presley for units in 1996. Mr. Swift stated Presley has 20 for 1995, 50 for 1996 and 30 for 1997. Their request is to shift that three-year phase one year into the future so there would be 20 in 1996, 50 in 1997 and 30 in 1998. There was then discussion regarding the Presley allocations and whether it would build in a specific year. Peter MacDonald, 400 Main Street, indicated there was also a special meeting of the School Board tonight, which is why there were not any Trustees at the Council meeting regarding the Del Prado site. He thanked Council for rezoning the site and felt that was a step in the right direction towards cooperation between the City and the School District. The School Board has approved the cooperation agreement that allows the City to control the timing and circumstances for annexation of the Pleasanton Middle School site. He explained that 75 % of the purchase price of the Del Prado will be paid as of March 21, 1996 provided the developer -- has unconditional growth management approval and a vested tentative map. Anything the City Council can do to assure growth management for the site will be of benefit to the School District 12/04/95 -15-