CCMIN112195 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Dennis said the urban limit lines are very important and that density was her biggest concern. The things outside the line shouldn't be dealt with until the General Plan is built out. Ms. Mohr asked if the urban limit line is seen as being what curren~y shows in the General Plan as our potential service area. Ms. Dennis thought yes, and also for Dublin and Livermore. Mayor Tarver believed that there is no way this community will vote for an expansion that is unlimited and without control. Ms. Michelotti stated that if we have an agreement that states we will build out the present Genera] Plan, it might entice DSRSD back to the table. She felt Pleasanton needs things to negotiate with, or flexibility. Hayward stated it will accept some sort of compromise. Mitigation fees are set and Hayward wanted the urban limit lines set. The in~uent/effluent issue was the only question. Ms. Mohr stated that she could accept a sunset in 2006 with a 2/3 vote. Ms. Michelotti felt if Pleasanton had the ability to talk about the year 2015, it might make a difference. Mr. Roush stated that the difference was that DSRSD says it cannot agree to a service area boundary because it is a service provider. Council needs to talk to Dublin or San Ramon for those communities to develop an urban limit line. Mayor Tarvet stated that eliminating the influent cap to the year 2006 with the 2/3 vote was the staff's idea on how we could break the impasse. Influent with recycling is free for landscaping or for P1easanton's use. Ms. Michelotti stated that a complete sunset at year 2015 is another point. This matter was then continued to the 11/28/95 agenda. Item 6n Alameda County TEA Grant ADDlieafion - P!easanton/Sunol Historic Railroad. This item was continued to the 11/28/95 aggnda. 11/21/95 -30.-