Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Tarver did not understand how we can allow the State Water Project make us pay <br /> for something we don't get. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dixon replied that it goes back to the bonded indebtedness. When the project was <br /> built, we agreed to pay for it. Thirty-five years ago no one worried about the environment and <br /> now environmental needs have to be met. We have to release water to the Delta and protect the <br /> fish, etc. There is no objection to doing that, but it was not foreseen 35 years ago. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis commented that you pay for the entitlement but you only get 75 % of the <br /> water, but you have to have the entitlement because of the legality of the commitment to the <br /> State Water Project. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dixon indicated the entitlement is what the system is built to deliver and 75 % is the <br /> average of the water that goes into it. We can still use the facility so that if more water is <br /> purchased those state facilities can be used to transport that water. Now the water can be <br /> pumped and pay the same power rates that will cost for the State water. The Monterey <br /> Agreement allows the purchased water the same priority for delivery to us. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvet asked if this in any way could be considered not in the public interest <br /> because of the mount of additional money that is being transferred (potentially $130 million <br /> .- added to the cost of the water because of transfer and entitlement fees). <br /> <br /> Mr. Dixon commented he would be willing at the State level to open the debate that this <br /> ought to be done differently. His opinion is that there is a system in the state that says that <br /> water is in public trust and therefore if the state determines that it needs it for whatever reason, <br /> it can ta~ it. At the same time, we say the water belongs to the people. There is an inherent <br /> conflict in that. Given the history of water development in this state, what Mr. Tarver is <br /> suggesting is a long way down the road. At some point in time, there needs to be a serious look <br /> at how water is used, developed and allocated. He did not think this system currently meets the <br /> needs. Transferring water is an in-between step. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvet did not feel first-come/first-served is the correct way to allocate water. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis questioned the process and commented that how we use water, how its <br /> allocated, and how we pay for it will always go on because we are always changing. She found <br /> it disturbing that Council did not know that the discussion was happening and asked if there was <br /> a way to participate in the future. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dixon indicated that if something like this came up in the future, he could be more <br /> diligent in keeping Council apprised of the fact. He felt the agencies involved look at the state <br /> system as something they built and paid for. In reality, this is a minor adjustment that only <br />__ affects those paying for the system. In essence, there isn't a big impact on the rest of the <br /> public. Zone 7 has been looking out for the interests of its customers. <br /> <br /> 11/14/95 -9- <br /> <br /> <br />