My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN110795
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCMIN110795
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:18 AM
Creation date
5/20/1999 11:42:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
process. The removal of the bulb to assist trucks will not help. It just keeps trucks away from <br />parked cars. Taking out the bulb will force trucks into the painted median as far as they can <br />go to miss the widened curb return. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr commented that the purpose of not widening Ray Street here is because staff <br />feels the aesthetics of this corner will be destroyed. Widening of the road would make it <br />resemble more the comers at the south end of town. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked for clarification as to the bulb-out if Ray Street is widened. She <br />asked if the bulb-out would be moved. <br /> <br /> Mr. Van Gelder replied that only a small slice of the bulb-out would be removed to line <br />up with the new section. This would accommodate the trucks/traffic without removing the entire <br />bulb-out. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked if Council would have to go back to the Ray Street widening if the <br />realignment issue comes forward. <br /> <br /> Mr. Van Gelder replied that this would be two separate actions. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti commented that if the requirement to dedicate the two feet of land is now <br />given up and is then needed in the future, it would have be purchased. <br /> <br /> Mr. Lum stated staff had not determined precisely what the alignment would be under <br />the realignment of that intersection. Council has not taken a position to fund that project so staff <br />has not proceeded with the design work. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti felt that the Ray Street widening would be the opportunity to get a better <br />configuration of traffic flow. Whether a new configuration is made eventually or not, the <br />volumes of traffic will increase. Clipping the bulb-out will help alleviate the left turn situation. <br />She will not be able to support a motion not to widen the road. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr did not think the widening would affect the corner aesthetically to make it look <br />different or out of place. She felt safety is an issue because it is a heavily travelled corner. It <br />has a large level of pedestrian traffic, particularly school kids. She cannot support a motion <br />without the opportunity in the future, at the time it becomes critical, for Council to widen Ray <br />Street. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked how the sidewalk would get built and where. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver stated that if Ray Street is ever aligned with St. John (should that be <br />decided in the future), there would be a considerable investment in condemning whatever <br />properties are on the corner to make the realignment. <br /> <br />11/07/95 - 12- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.