My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN090595
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCMIN090595
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:18 AM
Creation date
5/20/1999 11:33:23 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item 6~, <br />Review of the Final General Plan Steerins, Committee Recommendations for Updating, the <br />Pleasanton General Plan. (SR95:287) <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarvet stated that the purpose of this item is to establish the scope of the <br />environmental document and talk about what things are to be included, anything that might be <br />missing, options, and/or a need to have something referred back to committee. <br /> <br /> Wayne Rasmussen, Principal Planner, presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis commented on the Vineyard Corridor. She thought agricultural zoning in <br />Pleasanton was one unit per five acres. She asked if rural density/agricultural is one unit per <br />five acres? <br /> <br /> Mr. Rasmussen stated that it would be the very smallest parcel size that could be <br />approved in an agricultural zone. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked for clarification on the proposed density definitions. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rasmussen replied that high density would go down to four units per acre. The <br />medium density would be two to four units per acre and high density would be four units and <br />above. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr questioned whether the best time for a review of the West Las Positas <br />interchange is after all the EIR data is in. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rasmussen replied that the Steering Committee recommendation (as to that <br />interchange) would actually be translated into a General Plan program and assuming that gets <br />approved by the Council, then a committee would be assembled after the General Plan is <br />updated. Then the environmental and economic analysis would be conducted for the <br />interchange. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti commented that this interchange will remain on the General Plan and it <br />is not recommended that the West Las Positas interchange be removed from the General Plan. <br /> <br /> Mr. Rasmussen stated that the Committee felt the interchange should be deleted, but it <br />did not recommend that at this time. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked what the average single-family density is in a typical subdivision in <br />Pleasanton. The General Plan policy has used the median of the range and this will significantly <br />change the current make up of the City. <br /> <br />09/05/95 -15- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.