Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Michelotti asked if the project did not go forward at this time and the project was <br />postponed until Spring or another time, would that force the project back to square one to get <br />the financing? <br /> <br /> Mr. McClure said that there is funding from CFHA that approved the financing at a staff <br />level for the project when it was in for the tax credits. CFHA is waiting for a commitment from <br />the City and it will be on its agenda for the October meeting. The investors need to provide the <br />letter of commitment. The letter was available when it was submitted to the Tax Allocation <br />Committee and the investors indicated that they will follow through with this project. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti expressed concern that the City has gone too far out on a limb for this <br />project. If the City wanted to put a call out and ask if there is anyone else who would do this, <br />could this project be picked up again if no one came with a proposal. Has someone set up the <br />non-profit corporation and will there be a Pleasanton representative on the Board? <br /> <br /> Mr. McClure commented that anytime a project is held up six months or more the costs <br />change. Construction costs can go up, financing can go up, something might not be available, <br />rules can change, HUD rules change, the Tax Credit Allocation Committee criteria might change <br />or eliminate this project; there is no way to foresee what can happen or change. He felt that he <br />knows the business and felt they are experts on mixed income projects. No one else does them <br />because they are difficult to do. The construction can begin in October, but it does need <br />additional financing from the City, which is a loan to be repaid. He has talked with people on <br />the non-profit committee and they agreed it was a good idea to have a Pleasanton representative. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti inquired about the rent amounts. <br /> <br /> Mr. McClure stated that there will be 68 units that will always be "affordable". Right <br />now the low and very low incomes in Pleasanton are $200 to $250 below the market rates. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver stated that the rent for very low income households will be $490 to $677 <br />and low income households will be $594 to $821. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr stated that low income per HUD standards is based on the HUD numbers and <br />for the Bay Area; Pleasanton is not cheap. The City has lost the federal tax credits because <br />other communities are more needy. Needy people exist in every community. <br /> <br /> Mr. McClure commented that it wasn't the fact that HUD was not supporting affordable <br />housing (the tax credits are based on population); it's that the money is going to different areas <br />and not to Pleasanton. The need is based on census data. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr commented that there has been a series of commitments made by the City over <br />the years; one was to assess a low income fee to create the money to do a project like this. The <br />other was to create a citizens committee that initiated the process of getting Council to the point <br />of having a project considered. She was still concerned about the costs for a pool and asked that <br /> <br />08/22/95 -19- <br /> <br /> <br />