My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN080795
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCMIN080795
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:18 AM
Creation date
5/20/1999 11:27:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Item 4e <br />AP-95-08 (PUD-92-01-1~-95-22/Z-95-77) New Cities Development Group - Appeal of <br />the decision of the Planning ComrnlS$ion's approvin2 an application for master conditional <br />~JS¢ permit t0 aH0w secondary dwelling unit option in con_iunction with 36 single-family <br />detached houses on a previously artproved subdivision located on the northerly side of <br />Trenery_ Drive, 400 ft. westerly Of Martin Avenue. Zonin_~ for the property is PUD <br />(Planned Unit Development) - LI)R (Low Density Residential) District. (SR95:243) <br /> <br /> This item was continaed to the 8/15/95 agenda. <br /> <br />Item 4f <br />Resolution establishing Under_around Utility District 95-01. Foothill Road. MoHer Ranch. <br />(SR95:244) <br /> <br /> This item was continued to the 8/15/95 agenda. <br /> <br />Item <br />R.~.olution providln~ for partial distribution of surplus Assessment District 1982-4 iNIPD} <br />NOrth PleaSant0n ImprOvement DiStrict No. 1. (SR95:231) <br /> <br /> This item was continued to the 10/3/95 agenda. <br /> <br />Item 4h <br />l~rther reView of COnventiOn and Visitors Bureau 1995-96 budact. (SR95:253) <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta stated the Convention and Visitors Bureau budget was considered at the same <br />time the Council adopted the 1995/96 operating budget on June 21, 1995. At that time a final <br />budget was not agreed upon so staff recommended that Council adopt a budget of $106,000 for <br />the organization and staff would report back after further conversations with the Bureau. The <br />staff recommendation after further conversations is to maintain the $106,000 budget, especially <br />with the potential to restructure the CVB. In recent years the Council has questioned if the CVB <br />could become self-sufficient by increasing its revenue by a variety of forms, e.g., fund raising. <br />There was a task force when the Bureau was under the Chamber that created a three year <br />funding plan to phase down the City's grant of $185,000. The plan has had some minor <br />variations for some one-time expenses (office equipment and a sales position on commission <br />basis). After conversations with the Bureau, it is in agreement with the $106,000 funding in this <br />years' budget. <br /> <br /> Ms. Acosta continued that the discussions on having a Tri-Valley CVB have recently <br />become serious and the staffs from the cities of Livermore, Dublin, Pleasanton and San Ramon <br />have met to discuss this possibility. The current Board of Directors are in support of that <br /> <br />08107/95 -17- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.