My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN071895
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CCMIN071895
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:54:18 AM
Creation date
5/20/1999 11:23:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Huff stated that there is no architectural effect; the fence is for security only. <br /> <br /> Diane Churka, 507 St. Johns Street, stated the applicants chose Mr. Huff as their <br />architect because of his ability to blend older homes with modern additions. Ms. Churka stated <br />that this is not a generic building. She stated they bought the property to develop it for their <br />special use and have customers world-wide. The patio would be on the front side since they <br />wanted it to be on the sunny side. She originally wanted a gate on the front side but due to <br />security they changed their view. The double door and lift issue were to accommodate persons <br />in wheelchairs or who have trouble walking up stairs. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked how the lift would be incorporated in the building and how <br />unobtrusive would it be. She also asked if part of the deck area is at ground level. <br /> <br /> Ed Churka, 780 Main Street, stated the lift would be impossible to be observed. When <br />they do the ramping, gate and fence in the front, all you should notice is a push button and sign <br />indicating what to do. The wall by the upper and lower patio area can't be used as an access <br />area because if that is an access area, that will have to include a handicap access which will <br />eliminate four to six feet off the patio. Only the deck area in back is at ground level. He does <br />not understand why Ray Street needs to be widened but if the $25,000 includes his entire <br />contribution for sidewalks and the underground wiring, then he felt it was a fair and wouldn't <br />be opposed to it. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked if it were more expensive to put in underground utilities or to move <br />the power pole. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift stated that moving the power pole is cheaper because of PG&E's one-time free <br />move policy that is available when a street is widened. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti stated that the building will be conforming to the Downtown Guidelines <br />color configuration as the building is pastel with darker trim. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver asked who in the audience agrees that the design of Coffee Roast Express <br />should be approved. (A significant number of persons raised their hands.) <br /> <br /> A1 Bronzini, 3761 Lorena Avenue, stated he supported the Coffee Roast Express going <br />into downtown. He owned the property at 719 Main Street and felt there wasn't going to be a <br />great benefit widening Ray Street. There used to be a Chevron station with lots of cars coming <br />and going from all directions, so there should be no traffic problems. The addition of the <br />Coffee Roast Express will be a tremendous contribution to the community and to downtown. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti commented that in the Chevron station had access from Main Street and <br />in this design there will not be an access from Main Street. <br /> <br />07/18/95 -10- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.