CCMIN060695 - Laserfiche WebLink

inspections were being done; and if the report were inadequate or the Association did not respond, then the CC&Rs gives the City the right to undertake the work and make sure the work gets done in an adequate fashion. Mr. Pico stated that he felt the disclosure statement was weak and cited some examples. He stated that the nature of the disclosure statement skirts around the issues of the geologic review, and it suggests that anyone reading the disclosure statement obtain a memorandum from the City Planning Director to the City Manager dated May 2, 1994. He stated that anyone that asks for a disclosure from the City should be provided the May 2nd report and all copies of the City Council minutes and reports and agenda items that have subsequently been reviewed/presented, including the testimony from the homeowners and information from Councilmembers. He felt that it was inadequate to give a partial disclosure and not attempt to fully disclose the hazards that exist. Ms. Michelotti asked if the comprehensive staff report referred to is the one that the Council had at the meeting when this issue was first addressed. Mr. Roush stated that the referenced report dated May 2, 1994 is fai~y comprehensive in terms of what had happened to that point. He stated there are other parts to the disclosure that talks about other information available for review and it was staff's intent to include the things that Mr. Pico referred to. These items are available for review at City Hall. Ms. Mohr asked about the number of documents, including Council meetings minutes and other information about this project. Ms. Dennis stated that the information would have to be organized and accessible for people to find what they are looking for. She felt that it is important for the homeowner or potential homeowner to be familiar with the property and the kind of responsibility that comes with living there and why it is important for them to understand as much as possible as to what is happening on the site. Ms. Michelotti suggested that a file be available for the public to read or request copies of specific documents rather than have mounds of reports on hand. She thought that handing over massive documents would be overwhelming. Ms. Mohr talked about the frequency of inspections of the site. She thought the key to inspection frequency should be inches of rainfail. She asked if and how that could be done. Mr. Lum suggested that there could be a way to tie the need for inspections to abnormal rainfall and the language of the program could be modified to say that. Ms. Michelotti asked if the condition could be left as is but with the understanding that abnormal rainfall would automatically trigger an inspection. 06/06/95 9