CCMIN051695 - Laserfiche WebLink

Item 61 Review of Assembly Bill 1341 regardina S_nheres of InflUenCe Mr. Roush stated that this bill was introduced because of the problems that cities statewide have encountered attempting to annex property which is in their spheres of influence but which LAFCO's have effectively prevented. This is a 2 year bill, meaning that it won't be heard this year, but it can be heard next year. We will continue to work on this issue and begin to have the discussions with those counties and LAFCO's which are most affected by it. It was moved by Mr. Pico, and seconded by Ms. Dennis, to authorize staff to provide technical support, and authorize Mayor and/or staff to write letters and/or give testimony concerning legislation to provide more authority for cities to annex property within their spheres of influence. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers Dennis, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarver NOES: None ABSENT: Councilmember Michelotfi ABSTAIN: None 7, MATTERS INITIATED BY COUNCIL Ms. Mohr suggested the Council consider using the services of David Steibel regarding School District relations. Mayor Tarver discussed how he has approached the School Board regarding a mediated session but this never materialized or was pursued. Mayor Tarver stated that if the School Board demonstrates that there are no options or hope available to build a school there, he would consider rezoning the property. However, he did feel he had enough information at this time. Ms. Dennis indicated she had received many questions and felt the proposed meeting was justified. 8. CITY COUNCIL CALENDAR After discussion, the following dates were added: 6/5/95 - Operating Budget Workshop 6/7/95 - CIP Budget Workshop 6/8/95 and 6/12/95 - reserved, if continued discussion on the Operating or CIP Budget, is necessary 6/27/95 - Special Meeting to discuss Mirador Drive 05/16/95