Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Swift stated it could only be possible with City approval and it would be another <br /> modification of the PUD to create a new lot in the subdivision and would require a subdivision <br /> map. It would need the homeowners association approval, because of the CC&Rs, and City <br /> approval for the modification to the PUD and for the subdivision. <br /> <br /> It was moved by Ms. Dennis, and seconded by Mr. Pico, to deny the appeal and uphold <br /> the Planning Commission decision. <br /> <br /> Mr. Raber stated his belief that he had two separate appeals: first, of the Planning <br /> Commission's decision to deny consideration of an application of a second unit located outside <br /> the building envelope; and second, of the Planning Commission's decision to deny consideration <br /> of an application for a variance to locate a second unit outside the building envelope. He stated <br /> that these are two separate issues. <br /> <br /> Mr. Roush clarified that the Planning Commission denied consideration of the application <br /> for the second unit outside the building envelope in the absence of a PUD modification process <br /> which so far has not been followed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis clarified her motion and moved to adopt Resolution 95-50, denying the <br /> appeal and upholding the determination of the Planning Commission that the appellant must <br /> submit an application for a PUD modification in order to build a second unit outside the building <br /> envelope and that an application for a variance is not an acceptable procedure to build a second <br />- unit outside the building envelope. <br /> <br /> The roll call vote was as follows: <br /> AYES: Councilmembers Dennis, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarver <br /> NOES: None <br /> ABSENT: Councilmember Michelotti <br /> ABSTAIN: None <br /> <br /> Item 6b <br /> Status Report on Golden Eagle. <br /> <br /> This item was continued until 6/6/95. <br /> <br /> Item 6~ <br /> RZ-94-06. Signature Properties <br /> Application to amend section 18,96.090 of the Pleasanton MuniCipal Code (Temporary_ <br /> Subdivision SignS) to Create provisions to allow more than two off-site direCtional signs and <br /> more than one on-site temporary subdivision sign for advertising residential subdivisionS, <br /> <br /> This item was continued until 6/20/95. <br /> <br /> 05/16/95 <br /> -11- <br /> <br /> <br />