Laserfiche WebLink
I~em 6b <br />PUD-91-11-1M. Standard Pacific of Northern California (SR96:348) <br /> <br /> Brian Swift presented the staff report. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver requested confirmation that this major modification supersedes the previous <br />PUD approval and its conditions. He requested staff to provide a document with strikeouts and <br />bolding to more clearly indicate what has changed in the conditions. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift indicated that was correct with respect to Village II. He further stated that all <br />conditions of approval regarding the Specific Plan requirements or off-site development <br />requirements are identical. The only changes are the site plan, however other conditions of <br />approval, e.g. school impact fees, traffic light installation, Stoneridge Drive improvements, etc. <br />are the same. <br /> <br /> Mayor Tarver inquired regarding the difference of opinion between staff and the Planning <br />Commission on the size of the street. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift indicated there are various sized streets in Pleasanton that have evolved over <br />the years. When there is parking on one side of the street only, staff has used a 28 foot curb <br />to curb width. Standard Pacific showed streets with parking on one side only as 32 feet. Staff <br />recommended reducing the street to 28 feet and the Planning Commission recommended keeping <br />them at 32 feet. Staff recommendation would allow the additional four feet to be used in the <br />front or rear yards of the houses and briefly described how that could be done. <br /> <br /> Mr. Tarver asked if the Planning Commission wanted 32 feet because of potential parking <br />on both sides of the street or was it a safety issue? <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift felt it was for ease of traffic circulation and parking on both sides was not <br />contemplated. <br /> <br /> Ms. Michelotti asked what the street width was in the Signature project in Hacienda. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift indicated the small lot single-family product had 28 foot streets with parking <br />on one side. The Avila project had 28 foot streets with parking on one side and 24 foot streets <br />with no parking on the street. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico referred to the drawings and asked for clarification of the various street widths <br />in this development. There was discussion regarding this. He asked staff if a 32 foot street with <br />parking on both sides would be too narrow. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift explained that could work on low traffic volume streets where not many cars <br />would be passing at the same time. However, that is narrower than what is normally desired <br />for fire department operations. <br /> <br /> 7 12/03/96 <br /> <br /> <br />