My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN101596
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CCMIN101596
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:53:55 AM
Creation date
5/13/1999 11:19:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of apartments exceeds the growth management allocation by three units and there is no open <br />space provided for potential residents. <br /> <br /> G. Michael Goldsworthy, 3860 Blackhawk Road, Danville, architect for the applicant, <br />recounted the design process for this project, which has been going on since February. He <br />pointed out the 350 Main building was approved for 200% lot coverage and his building is only <br />80% lot coverage. Downtown lots are hard to develop. He indicated his client was willing to <br />pay the in-lieu parking fees up front when the building permits are issued. He and his clients <br />followed all the guidelines and policies and now the project is being appealed. There was <br />concern about paying the in-lieu fees, but there is an agreement that was entered into freely by <br />the property owner. Mr. Goldsworthy then explained that the plan could be redesigned for <br />office uses with only minor changes to the exterior of the building. As a matter of fact, that is <br />what the owner wanted in the first place. If offices are what the neighborhood and Council <br />wants, the owner is willing to design the project that way. They are also willing to make their <br />parking area open to the public. <br /> <br /> Mr. Pico asked if the owner has actually agreed to have office use instead of residential? <br /> <br /> Mr. Goldsworthy said yes and described the revised design. <br /> <br /> Ms. Mohr asked if the 350 Main Street building was designed to allow a second story. <br /> <br /> Mr. Goldsworthy said yes and a second floor could be added on at any time. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis asked for a little more detail on the interior design of the offices and Mr. <br />Goldsworthy explained the design. <br /> <br /> There being no further speakers, the public hearing was dosed. <br /> <br /> Ms. Dennis inquired about the different parking requirements for restaurants and offices. <br /> <br /> Mr. Swift explained that the parking requirement for restaurants is higher than for <br />offices. Once a building is built, a restaurant use could go in without requiring additional <br />spaces. This provision is one of the major reasons for the success of downtown. He believed <br />that many of the restaurants would not have located downtown if the owners had been told they <br />would have to pay a sizeable in-lieu parking fee. He described the in-lieu parking agreement <br />for the 350 Main Street building and how the fees were calculated. In contrast, the subject <br />property owner will pay his in-lieu fees at the time the building permit is issued. If Council so <br />chooses, it can require the calculation of in-lieu fees to assume a portion of the building will be <br />restaurant use. <br /> <br /> -8- <br /> 10/15/96 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.