CCMIN070996 - Laserfiche WebLink

The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarver NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Vineyard Corridor Mr. Tarver felt that there was a misunderstanding of what he wanted the Vineyard Corridor to look like in the amended General Plan. His intent was to say the Vineyard Corridor becomes a study area, that the land use designations for the study area is divided up the way the Steering Committee recommended, with the understanding that if additional units can be attained and still maintain the principles that are outlined in the General Plan for that corridor (being a gateway, encouraging vineyards, etc.) that we would talk about moving the density up. What came back to him was that people thought he said allow between 127 to 480 units. That is not what he intended to say at all. Ms. Mohr also wanted clarification on where the boundary of the Vineyard Corridor began. Mr. Swift indicated the Vineyard Corridor is everything from the Hatsushi property east, not from the landfill east. Ms. Michelotfi indicated the point of the prior motion was that no one could identify a specific number of units. That is why a study area was designated and the direction for a Specific Plan. Ms. Dennis also indicated the study area was so that additional uses could be considered. She was not uncomfortable with the Steering Committee recommendation in terms of the number of units. Ms. Michelotti said that the motion that was made was to have a study area for a Specific Plan and number of Units was not designated. The current land use designations would not go away; they would remain while the area is being studied. Mr. Swift indicated there is a big difference between designating something a study area and designating it for a specific plan that has certain kinds of uses attached to it. His recollection of the motion was to require a specific plan for this entire area. His interpretation of the former motion was that the land uses that were established by the Steering Committee in terms of uses would be included in that area. That would include agriculture, open space, rural, low and medium density residential, school and park. All of those could be potential uses and the motion said we would not establish any number in terms of what the number of units would be. Staff was to bring back the specific plan that identified how to meet all the policies that 07109196 -39-