CCMIN070196 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ms. Michelotti wanted to be able to look at the proposal regarding the Spotomo property. Ms. Mohr felt the adjustment for the Spotomo was small enough that a minor adjustment would take care of that. Ms. Michelotti supported the concept of a permanent line, but wanted assurance that future General Plan reviews can make adjustments. The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Pieo, and Mayor Tarver NOES: Councilmembers - Michelotti and Mohr ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None Ad_iustments to the Urban Growth Boundary_ It was moved by 1VIr. Pico, seconded by Ms. Dennis, to approve the General Plan Steering Committee recommendations as follows: Modify page II-7, paragraph 6, first sentence, to read as follows: "Since the UGB is considered to be permanent, future adjustments are discouraged; however, minor adjustments may be granted which: (1) are otherwise consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan; (2) would not have a significant adverse impact on agriculture, wildl_and areas or scenic ridgellne views; (3) would not permit leap frog development; (4) would not induce further adjustments to the boundary; (5) which demonstrate that the full range of urban public facilities and services can be adequately provided in an efficient and timely manner." The roll call vote was as follows: AYES: Councilmembers - Dennis, Michelotti, Mohr, Pico, and Mayor Tarver NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None South Pleasanton Mr. Rasmussen explained the intent of this provision was to provide flexibility in density so every parcel is not limited to two acre minimums. For instance, on a ten acre parcel, with two acre minimums, there would be five parcels of two acres each. With the two acre maximum density, you could have clustered homes on five 1/2-acre parcels with seven and half acres left in open space or used for horse stables, golf course, or other types of use. 07/01/96 -18-